A broad coalition of U.S. business organizations, including the Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry and the Arizona Manufacturers Council, is urging Congress to approve a long-term reauthorization of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM), arguing the agency plays a critical role in helping American manufacturers compete globally.

In a July 21 letter to lawmakers, 319 companies, trade associations, state chambers of commerce, manufacturers’ groups and local business organizations from all 50 states called on Congress to pass a robust 10-year reauthorization of EXIM before its authorization expires later this year.

The coalition argues that export financing has become an increasingly important competitive tool as foreign governments expand support for their domestic industries. The letter notes that more than 115 foreign export credit agencies are actively supporting exporters in their respective countries and points to China’s estimated $24 billion in medium- and long-term export credit support in 2024, more than four times the volume officially supported by the United States.

“EXIM is an essential tool that helps American exporters compete globally and level the playing field,” the organizations wrote, adding that the bank’s financing programs can determine whether U.S. companies win international contracts, expand operations and create jobs.

According to the coalition, EXIM authorized $8.7 billion in transactions during fiscal year 2025, supporting approximately 40,000 American jobs. More than 87% of those transactions directly benefited small businesses. Since 1992, the bank has generated a net $9.8 billion for the U.S. Treasury while maintaining a low default rate.

“Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­anufacturers compete in a global marketplace every day. The Export-Import Bank helps ensure that American companies aren’t forced to compete with one hand tied behind their backs while foreign governments aggressively finance their own industries,” Arizona Manufacturers Council Executive Director Grace Appelbe said. “A long-term reauthorization of EXIM will provide the certainty businesses need to invest, grow, and support high-quality manufacturing jobs here in Arizona and across the country, which is why we’re urging Congress to act.”

Beyond extending the agency’s authorization for a decade, the letter calls on Congress to strengthen EXIM’s ability to operate during board vacancies, expand its China and Transformational Exports Program, and revise lending restrictions that the coalition says unnecessarily limit the bank’s competitiveness against foreign export credit agencies.

Arizona organizations signing the letter include the Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry, Arizona Manufacturers Council, Arizona Regional Economic Development Foundation, Buckeye Valley Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce, Chandler Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce, Coolidge Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce, Fountain Hills Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce, Greater Phoenix Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­, Mesa Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce, Nogales Santa Cruz County Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce, PHX East Valley Partnership, Scottsdale Area Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce, and The Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Southern Arizona. The National Association of Manufacturers coordinated the nationwide sign-on effort, which drew support from major corporations including Boeing, Ford Motor Co., Lockheed Martin, Siemens Energy, Toyota Motor North America and the U.S. Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce, along with hundreds of state and local business organizations.

image via

The post Business coalition, including several Ariz. groups, urges Congress to approve long-term EXIM reauthorization appeared first on Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­.

The Arizona Supreme Court has declined to review a legal challenge involving a planned hotel development in Marana, leaving in place an appellate ruling that the project’s development agreement is not subject to referendum.

The Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry participated through the Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ Legal Center, filing an amicus curiae brief urging the Supreme Court to let the lower court ruling stand.

“This is a significant result for Marana and for communities across Arizona that rely on a predictable development process,” said Vanessa Pomeroy, chief counsel of the Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ Legal Center. “The courts have now consistently recognized that the referendum power cannot be used to reopen every administrative action taken to implement a land-use plan that has already been publicly considered and adopted. Businesses need to know that when they follow the rules and a project receives the required approvals, those decisions will carry some measure of finality.”

The case began after Marana rejected referendum petitions challenging a development agreement for a planned hotel project. A Pima County Superior Court judge sided with the town, and the Arizona Court of Appeals later upheld that ruling, finding the agreement carried out an existing development plan and was therefore not subject to referendum.

The agreement covers approximately 19 acres of town-owned property near Marana Main Street and Civic Center Drive and is tied to the Rancho Marana West Town Center Specific Plan, adopted in 2008. The plan calls for a mixed-use town center that could include commercial, retail, office, entertainment, residential and hospitality uses.

Arizonans for Responsible Development sought to place the Town Council’s approval of the agreement before voters. Marana declined to process the petitions, arguing that the resolution implemented an existing development plan rather than creating new policy.

That distinction is central under Arizona law. Legislative actions can generally be challenged through referendum, while administrative actions ordinarily cannot.

In its June ruling, the Court of Appeals said the development agreement “furthers an already-declared policy” and concluded that the resolution was “not legislative but administrative and is therefore not referable.”

The court also rejected the challengers’ broader argument that all municipal development agreements are automatically subject to referendum, finding that state law does not eliminate the traditional distinction between legislative and administrative actions.

Pomeroy said the outcome matters beyond the Marana project because businesses, developers and local governments rely on clear rules and dependable timelines when making investment decisions.

“The referendum is an important constitutional safeguard, but it’s not a tool for creating perpetual uncertainty around approved development,” Pomeroy said. “There has to be a clear line between creating new policy and implementing policy that has already been adopted. That distinction matters for communities, employers and developers trying to move projects forward.”

The Supreme Court’s decision leaves the appellate ruling intact, ending the challengers’ effort to place the development agreement before voters.

The post Court decision clears final legal hurdle for Marana hotel project appeared first on Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­.

Arizona voters head to the polls Tuesday, July 21, to help determine which candidates will advance to November’s General Election.

If you still plan to vote, here’s what you need to know before Election Day.

It’s too late to mail your ballot

If you still have an early ballot at home, do not place it in the mail. The deadline for returning ballots by mail has passed.

Instead, voters should return their completed ballot to an authorized ballot drop box or voting location, or vote in person on Election Day.

Find your voting location

Voters can locate their polling place, vote center, or ballot drop-off location through their county election office.

County election contact information is available through the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office:

Voters in Arizona’s two largest counties can also use these direct resources:

Most polling places are open from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. Any voter who is in line by 7 p.m. is entitled to cast a ballot.

Bring identification

Arizona law requires voters casting a ballot in person to present identification before receiving a ballot. One acceptable photo ID with your name and address—or a qualifying combination of non-photo identification documents—is sufficient.

Here’s a of the acceptable forms of ID.

Independent voters can participate

Arizona has an open primary system. Voters registered as independents or with no recognized party affiliation may choose either a Democratic or Republican ballot when voting in the primary. They may vote only one party’s ballot.

Check the business community’s endorsements

For voters interested in learning which candidates have earned the support of Arizona’s business community, the Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry has published its 2026 Primary Election endorsements.

View the complete list here:

Track your ballot

If you’ve already voted early or dropped off your ballot, you can verify that it has been received and counted through .

Voters can also use the portal to confirm their registration status and view other election information.

Tuesday’s election will determine the nominees for numerous federal, statewide, legislative, county, and local offices. Those winners will advance to the General Election on Nov. 3.

The post Arizona Primary Election is Tuesday: What to know. appeared first on Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­.

The Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry has announced its endorsements for the July 21, 2026 primary election, backing a bipartisan group of candidates for the Arizona Legislature, Congress, and the Arizona Corporation Commission.

The endorsements, approved by the Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­â€™s board of directors following recommendations from its Political Affairs Committee, reflect what the organization describes as a continued focus on supporting candidates whose records and policy positions align with the Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­â€™s Business Agenda, an annual document that outlines the organization’s positions on various public policy issues.

“Good policy has helped make Arizona one of the most attractive places in the country to start, grow, or relocate a business,” Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ President and CEO Danny Seiden said. “The decisions made at the Capitol, in Congress, and at the Corporation Commission have real consequences for employers, workers, and communities across our state. Many of the candidates we’re endorsing have already demonstrated a strong commitment to protecting Arizona’s competitive advantage, and we’re confident this slate will bring the serious leadership and practical solutions needed to keep that momentum going.”

The Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­â€™s endorsements include candidates from both major political parties and span races across the state. Among those receiving the Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­â€™s backing are Republican legislative leaders and Democratic lawmakers, as well as U.S. Reps. Greg Stanton (D) and Juan Ciscomani (R).

The organization said incumbents were evaluated based on their voting records and their alignment with the Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­â€™s policy priorities. Candidates seeking offices they have not previously held were asked to complete questionnaires and participate in interviews with members of the Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ Political Affairs Committee before recommendations were forwarded to the board of directors for final approval.

The Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­â€™s endorsements come as Arizona prepares for a competitive election cycle that will determine the makeup of the Legislature and other key offices that influence the state’s economic climate.

The Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ also endorsed incumbent Arizona Corporation Commissioners Kevin Thompson and Nick Myers. The commission regulates utilities and oversees matters affecting energy reliability, infrastructure investment, and rates.

“Reliable, affordable energy is one of the most important issues in today’s economy,” Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ Executive Vice President Courtney Coolidge said. “Sustaining Arizona’s rapid growth means electing leaders who will work to ensure we have the energy mix and modern infrastructure that job creators demand.”

The organization said additional endorsements could be issued ahead of the general election, which culminates on Tuesday, Nov. 3.

The full list of endorsements can be found .

The post Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ announces bipartisan endorsements for 2026 primary election appeared first on Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­.

The Arizona Legislature wrapped up its 2026 session after 153 days, leaving the state’s business community with a mix of accomplishments to celebrate and concerns about Arizona’s long-term competitiveness.

Business leaders pointed to several significant victories, including expanded health coverage options for small employers, additional infrastructure funding to support economic development projects, preservation of key economic development tools, and a bipartisan budget that avoided broad-based tax increases. At the same time, they expressed concern about reductions to public university funding, the repeal of a longstanding job-creation incentive, and policy changes affecting future data center investment.

“Like most sessions in divided government, this legislative session delivered a mixed bag of results for job creators,” said Courtney Coolidge, executive vice president of the Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry. “The good news is that Arizona continues to demonstrate a commitment to economic growth, competitive tax policy, and job creation. The challenge moving forward is ensuring we don’t undermine the very advantages that have made Arizona one of the most attractive places in the country to invest and grow.”

Among the business community’s top priorities this year was legislation aimed at helping small employers provide affordable health coverage to workers.

HB 2693, sponsored by Rep. David Livingston and signed into law by Gov. Katie Hobbs, creates a pathway for small businesses to join together through a statewide business organization to purchase health coverage. Supporters say the measure will allow smaller employers to increase purchasing power, reduce costs, and provide more stable benefit options.

“Small businesses often face the greatest challenges when it comes to offering competitive health benefits,” Coolidge said. “This legislation creates a voluntary, market-based option that gives employers more flexibility and employees more choices.”

Another significant victory came through the state budget, which included additional funding capacity for Arizona’s Public Infrastructure Program, a tool frequently used to support large-scale economic development projects.

The program helps communities finance roads, water systems, and other infrastructure needed to accommodate major investments. It has been utilized in projects involving companies such as TSMC, Intel, Amkor, and LG Energy Solution Arizona.

“Arizona’s economic success depends on our ability to compete for transformational projects,” Arizona Manufacturers Council Executive Director Grace Appelbe said. “Those investments don’t happen without infrastructure, and communities need tools that allow them to prepare for growth.”

The Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ also praised lawmakers for largely preserving the Arizona Competes Fund, one of the state’s primary economic development incentives. Early budget discussions included proposals to sweep money from the fund to help address budget shortfalls, but the final agreement maintained most of the program.

In addition, the budget included full conformity with recent federal tax changes, avoided broad-based business tax increases, and provided funding to support Arizona’s ongoing Colorado River negotiations.

Still, business leaders say several decisions made during the session could create challenges in the years ahead.

One of the biggest concerns was the repeal of the Quality Jobs Tax Credit, a program designed to encourage companies to create high-wage jobs and make major capital investments in Arizona.

The Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ also expressed concern over a three-year pause on issuing new sales tax exemption certificates for future data center projects. While existing projects will continue under current agreements, supporters of the incentive argue that uncertainty surrounding future projects could make Arizona less competitive in attracting additional investment.

“The state’s economic momentum didn’t happen by accident,” Coolidge said. “For years, Arizona has built a reputation for consistency and predictability. We don’t want to send a message to investors that they can’t plan for the long-term.”

Higher education funding remains another area of concern for the business community.

Arizona employers have increasingly emphasized the importance of workforce development as the state’s economy continues to expand. Business advocates warned that cuts to public universities could affect the talent pipeline needed to support growth in industries ranging from advanced manufacturing and semiconductors to healthcare and technology.

“Workforce remains one of the defining economic issues facing Arizona,” Coolidge said. “If we want to continue attracting investment and creating opportunity, we have to continue investing in the talent that makes those opportunities possible.”

Attention will now shift from the Legislature to voters, who will weigh in on several measures referred to the ballot by lawmakers, as well as potential citizen initiatives that are still gathering signatures.

For Arizona employers, the end of the legislative session marks the beginning of another important phase in shaping the state’s economic future.

“Arizona remains in a strong position,” Coolidge said. “In the months ahead, we’ll encourage voters to elect leaders who will continue making the decisions necessary to stay ahead of states that are competing for the same jobs, investments, and talent.”

Image courtesy by

The post Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ assesses legislative session’s highs and lows appeared first on Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­.

This column by Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry President and CEO Danny Seiden originally appeared in the on May 27, 2026.

According to the latest  from the American Legislative Exchange Council, Arizona ranks second in the nation for economic growth over the past 10 years. During that time, we’ve ranked in the top-5 for GDP growth, domestic migration, and employment growth, clear indicators of our strength as a destination for both business and talent.

Arizona has also ranked No. 1 on the Common Sense Institute’s  every year since 2019. That growth has translated into real gains for Arizonans: more jobs, rising incomes, and the largest percentage-point decline in poverty in the country.

Despite this undeniable track record, a misguided proposal from some lawmakers threatens to wipe out a key piece of our economic toolbox at precisely the wrong time.

Specifically, they are calling for a sweep of the Arizona Competes Fund, a move that would effectively pull the rug out from under dozens of projects already underway, inflicting lasting damage on the state’s economic credibility.

A complete sweep would jeopardize 34 projects for which grants have already been committed, representing more than 21,000 potential new jobs and more than $12.6 billion in capital investment. That’s like wiping out an entire year’s worth of economic development progress.

Even more concerning, forcing the state to renege on commitments — after funds were appropriated by the Legislature — would trigger a serious crisis of confidence. If Arizona is willing to walk away from its obligations to employers and investors, why would anyone trust it to honor future commitments?

As budget negotiations continue, some have talked about eliminate the Quality Jobs Tax Credit, a program that has been key to making Arizona a magnet for corporate headquarters relocations.  reports that the Phoenix metro ranks in the top 4 for HQ relocations since 2018, projects that come with significant high-wage job gains — the type that fuel additional growth across the economic ladder.

The  is actively competing for an additional 51 HQ projects, representing more than 11,000 potential new jobs with average wages over $90,000 — demonstrating both the opportunity ahead and what’s at stake if Arizona gets this wrong.

At a moment when the state is competing for once-in-a-generation economic opportunities, maintaining Arizona’s credibility and business reputation is absolutely essential.

To be clear: Arizona’s transparent, effective economic development programs should be viewed as a model for the nation. Unlike so many of our competitor states, Arizona does not engage in opaque, backroom deals.

Instead, our programs are accountable and performance-based, with criteria outlined in statute and companies only receiving funds after they’ve filled their commitments. Arizona doesn’t place risky bets. 

These tools complement Arizona’s core advantages: a skilled workforce, modern infrastructure, and a pro-growth tax and regulatory environment.

They also deliver a strong return. Analysis from the ACA shows that companies participating in the Competes program have created more than 22,000 jobs with an average wage approaching $90,000. Those projects have generated over $1.2 billion in state and local tax revenue — meaning every $1 invested returns more than $22 to the public.

Eliminating this program would not produce meaningful budget savings. Instead, it would likely reduce future revenue by driving away jobs, wages and investment.

And if Arizona steps back, other states will step in. Competitors like Texas, Ohio and California would welcome the opportunity to capture projects that might otherwise have come here.

As Warren Buffett famously observed, it takes years to build a reputation and minutes to destroy it. Over the past decade, Arizona has earned a reputation as one of the most reliable places in the country to do business.

Lawmakers should come together to pass a responsible budget that protects and strengthens the policies driving Arizona’s growth. Arizona has spent a decade earning its reputation. Now is not the time to risk it.

Danny Seiden is the president and CEO of the Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry.

The post Opinion: Arizona’s economic credibility at risk as lawmakers eye fund sweep, tax credit elimination appeared first on Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­.

The Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry convened business leaders and policymakers last Friday for its annual Update from Capitol Hill luncheon, which featured a timely and wide-ranging discussion with U.S. Reps. Greg Stanton (D) and Juan Ciscomani (R) alongside national political analysis from Jonathan Martin of Politico.

A federal outlook with Arizona implications

The conversation with Stanton and Ciscomani covered a broad policy landscape, reflecting the complex and interconnected challenges facing Arizona employers. Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ included infrastructure investment, international trade, workforce development, regulatory reform, foreign affairs, and ongoing negotiations over the Colorado River—issues with immediate and long-term consequences for the state’s economic outlook.

For Arizona’s business community, the opportunity to hear directly from members of Congress—particularly in a divided government environment—remains a central value of the event.

A battleground state in focus

Providing a national lens, Martin offered a detailed assessment of the 2026 election cycle, with particular emphasis on Arizona’s role as a key battleground state. His analysis highlighted the evolving dynamics of modern campaigns, including the growing influence of social media platforms and artificial intelligence in shaping voter behavior and information consumption.

The discussion underscored the degree to which national political trends are increasingly intertwined with local economic and policy considerations, especially in a state that continues to draw national attention.

A signature forum for dialogue

Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ President and CEO Danny Seiden emphasized the importance of maintaining strong connections between the business community and federal policymakers.

“This event continues to be one of the most important opportunities we have each year to bring Arizona’s business leaders together with the people shaping policy in Washington,” Seiden said. “We’re grateful to Congressman Stanton and Congressman Ciscomani for sharing their perspectives and engaging in a candid discussion on the issues that matter most to our state. And Jonathan Martin provided valuable insight into a rapidly evolving political environment, especially as we head into a consequential midterm election year.”

The luncheon was made possible through the support of presenting sponsor Salt River Project, along with sponsors EPCOR, Arizona Public Service, Mastercard, and Banner Health.

The post Arizona congressmen and leading national political commentator converge for Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­â€™s Update from Capitol Hill appeared first on Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­.

The Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry will host its annual Update from Capitol Hill luncheon on Friday at the Arizona Biltmore, bringing together members of Arizona’s congressional delegation and one of the country’s most closely watched political analysts.

will feature U.S. Reps. Juan Ciscomani and Greg Stanton, along with Jonathan Martin of Politico, columnist and host of the .

Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ spoke with Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ President and CEO Danny Seiden about the event and what he’s most interested in hearing.

Tell us about Update from Capitol Hill. It’s one of the Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­â€™s premier annual events, isn’t it?

Danny Seiden:

It really is one of our signature events each year. What makes it so valuable is that it brings Arizona’s business community face-to-face with members of our congressional delegation at a time when so many federal decisions are directly affecting our state’s economy.

There’s no substitute for hearing directly from the people who are in the room making those decisions—whether it’s on taxes, trade, infrastructure, or regulatory policy. And just as important, it gives our members a chance to better understand the dynamics in Washington and how those decisions translate back home to Arizona.

What topics are you anticipating you’ll hear about from Congressmen Ciscomani and Stanton?

There’s certainly no shortage of issues right now. Water is always top of mind in Arizona, and I expect that to be part of the conversation given the federal government’s role in long-term solutions.

Beyond that, I think we’ll hear a lot about the broader state of Congress—how things are functioning, what’s realistic in terms of bipartisan cooperation, and what we can expect over the coming months.

There are also a lot of frontpage issues—from border policy to economic conditions to foreign affairs—that have real implications for Arizona employers. Having both Congressman Ciscomani and Congressman Stanton there gives us a valuable bipartisan perspective on those challenges.

This year the Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ is welcoming Jonathan Martin from Politico. What do you believe he’ll add to the conversation?

is one of the most respected political commentators in the country. He’s been covering national politics for a long time, and he brings a level of experience and insight that’s hard to match.

He’s also a regular presence on the Sunday shows, so he’s constantly plugged into the national conversation. With this being an election year, his perspective on the state of politics—where things stand heading into the primaries and what to expect in November—will be incredibly valuable.

Honestly, there are very few people who can provide that kind of real-time, informed analysis of what’s happening in Washington and on the campaign trail. I think our attendees will really benefit from hearing his take.

How do federal decisions right now directly impact Arizona’s business community, and what should employers here be paying closest attention to?

Federal policy has a very real, day-to-day impact on Arizona employers, whether people always see that connection or not. Decisions coming out of Washington affect everything from the cost of doing business to the availability of workforce and the reliability of our supply chains.

For Arizona, trade and border policy are especially important. We’re a major gateway state, so anything that affects cross-border commerce—whether it’s customs operations, infrastructure, or security—has a direct impact on our economy. The USMCA review is coming up, for example, so we’re paying close attention to that.

Energy is another major factor right now. Global uncertainty, particularly events in the Middle East, can create volatility in energy markets, and that has a ripple effect across the economy. When fuel costs rise, it impacts everything from what we pay at the pump to the cost of transporting goods, which ultimately shows up in prices on store shelves.

And, obviously, water is also an area where federal involvement matters, particularly in terms of long-term planning and investment. I know our delegation is deeply involved in that issue.

And of course, tax and regulatory policy always play a role in shaping whether businesses can grow and compete.

I’d also point to the overall economic environment—interest rates, inflation, and federal spending decisions—all of which influence business confidence and investment.

The bottom line is that what happens shows up here in Arizona, and that’s why it’s so important for our business community to stay informed and engaged.

More about this year’s Update from Capitol Hill luncheon can be found on the Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­â€™s .

The post Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ CEO Danny Seiden previews Update from Capitol Hill event appeared first on Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­.

House Bill 4115, legislation by Speaker of the House Steve Montenegro is scheduled for consideration by the full state House, while companion legislation in the state Senate by Sen. T.J. Shope is similarly ready for consideration by the full Senate.

Here’s a look at how the bills would align the local initiative process with the well-established processes at a state level and protect local economic development efforts.

Bills align local initiative processes with established statewide initiative processes

House Bill 4115, introduced by Speaker of the House Steve Montenegro, seeks to standardize the regulation of initiative and referendum measures across Arizona by expanding state-level requirements to municipal and county levels. A mirror bill, SB 1489 by state Sen. T.J. Shope, has been introduced in the Senate.

The legislation focuses on three primary pillars:

• Increased transparency for paid petition circulators
• Mandatory financial disclosures for spending-related measures
• The creation of regulatory parity between state and local ballot processes

Supported by a broad coalition of the Arizona business community, the bill aims to protect the integrity of the ballot from out-of-state interests, support local decisionmaking, and provide voters with clearer information regarding the fiscal impacts of proposed local laws.

Key regulatory changes

HB 4115 and SB 1489 amend several sections of the Arizona Revised Statutes (Title 19) to ensure that the standards applied to statewide measures are nearly as practicable for local jurisdictions.

Paid circulator requirements

The bill introduces identification and disclosure protocols for paid circulators to ensure voters understand who is soliciting their signatures, similar to the protocols in other states.

Financial disclosure and revenue sources

A critical component for local fiscal management is the new requirement for measures that mandate expenditures. Any municipal or county initiative or referendum that proposes a mandatory expenditure, establishes a specific fund, or allocates funding must:

• Provide a disclosure of the expenditure or allocation.
• Include this funding disclosure within the 200-word initiative description provided to voters.

Economic impact and business community perspectives

The Arizona business community has signaled strong support for HB 4115 and SB 1489, viewing it as a defense against out-of-state activists who leverage local processes to advance narrow political agendas that may conflict with regional economic development.

Proponent coalition

The bill is backed by a diverse group of organizations, including:

• Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry
• Arizona Restaurant Association
• Greater Phoenix Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­
• Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC)
• United Dairymen of Arizona
• Valley Partnership
• Local chambers of commerce across Arizona

Leadership insights

• Danny Seiden, president and CEO of the Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry: “These bills contain commonsense reforms that protect the integrity of the ballot, ensure voters know who is behind an initiative, and provide clearer information about proposals that would require new taxpayer-funded spending.”
• Courtney Coolidge, executive vice president of the Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­: Coolidge has noted that out-of-state activists exploit the lack of guardrails at the local level. The goal of HB 4115 and SB 1489 is to ensure state and local processes are “equally rigorous” to prevent economic strategies from being “sidelined.”

Case study in local volatility: The Marana data center dispute

Current litigation in the Town of Marana underscores the administrative and legal friction that the legislation aims to mitigate through clearer standards.

• The conflict: Residents filed a lawsuit against the Town of Marana after the town clerk rejected a referendum targeting a proposed data center.
• The technicality: The organizers behind the petition campaign argue that their submission was out of compliance and should thus be withdrawn. Supporters not affiliated with the organized referendum campaign, however,  argue that the petitions cannot be withdrawn.
• Business implication: Such disputes demonstrate how local economic development projects can be stalled by procedural ambiguities in the referendum process, highlighting the need for the consistent standards proposed in HB 4115 and SB 1489.

Public sentiment and voter data

Polling conducted by Cygnal in December 2025 indicates that the provisions in HB 4115 and SB 1489 align with a vast majority of Arizona voters:

• 90% believe ballot initiatives should be driven by Arizona residents rather than out-of-state organizations.
• 84% support requiring paid circulators to wear visible identification badges.
• 80% support requiring initiatives that mandate spending to identify a specific funding source.
• 70% support achieving parity between state and local initiative requirements.

The case for passage

• Uniformity is priority: Standardization of initiative processes reduces the ability of activists to target smaller municipalities with less-regulated processes.
• Fiscal accountability: Future local initiatives will be required to disclose potential costs of their proposals, potentially reducing the risk of unfunded mandates that impact the local tax base.
• Bipartisan support: HB 4115 passed the House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections Committee with a 5-2 bipartisan vote. SB 1489 was cleared by the Senate Judiciary and Elections Committee. Both bills are ready for consideration by the full House and Senate, respectively.
• Grassroots efforts unaffected: Initiative campaigns by local residents are not affected by the provisions of the legislation.

Photo courtesy Elizabeth Jenkins, licensed as CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

The post Explainer: How HB 4115 and SB 1489 strengthen transparency and accountability in local initiative processes appeared first on Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­.

The Arizona House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections Committee on Wednesday advanced two measures designed to bring greater transparency, consistency, and voter clarity to Arizona’s local initiative process.

House Bill 4115, sponsored by Speaker of the House Steve Montenegro (R-Goodyear), passed on a bipartisan 5-2 vote.

The bill’s proponents, who include a broad coalition of the Arizona business community including the Arizona Restaurant Association, Greater Phoenix Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­, Valley Partnership, Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and local chambers of commerce across the state, say the bill ensures greater accountability in the way local ballot measures are circulated and presented to voters.

In addition, HCR 2051, sponsored by House Majority Leader Michael Carbone (R-Buckeye), passed the committee on a 4-3 vote. If approved by the Legislature, HCR 2051 would send the same reforms contained in the Montenegro bill to the November ballot.

Together, the measures reflect a growing recognition among lawmakers that while Arizona’s initiative process is a powerful and important constitutional tool, it must operate with transparency, fairness, and clear information for voters.

“Most of what the bill and referral do are already in place for statewide ballot measures,” Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry Executive Vice President Courtney Coolidge said. “But out-of-state activists know there are relatively few guardrails around the initiative process at a local level. We’re attempting to fix that to ensure both state and local initiative processes are equally rigorous.”

Bringing parity and transparency to the process

Supporters of the legislation note that the reforms are aimed at improving disclosure, strengthening voter awareness, and ensuring consistent standards for paid petition circulators, particularly in cases where ballot measures would mandate new government spending or impose significant fiscal impacts on taxpayers.

The measures seek to:

• Establish consistent rules and accountability standards for paid petition circulators.
• Improve disclosure requirements for initiatives that mandate new government spending.
• Ensure voters receive clear, accurate information before signing petitions or casting ballots.
• Promote parity between state and local initiative requirements.

Proponents argue that these changes do not diminish the initiative process but instead protect it by reinforcing public trust and transparency.

“Arizona’s initiative process is a powerful tool, and it should be driven by Arizona residents with transparency and accountability,” said Danny Seiden, president and CEO of the Arizona Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­ of Commerce & Industry. “These bills contain commonsense reforms that protect the integrity of the ballot, ensure voters know who is behind an initiative, and provide clearer information about proposals that would require new taxpayer-funded spending.” 

Broad support

Coolidge said the 5-2 bipartisan vote on HB 4115 underscores support from members on both sides of the aisle for strengthening disclosure and accountability in the initiative system.

“We’re hopeful that members of both parties will continue to support these bills as they make their way through the process,” she said. “Without these reforms, communities across the state—big and small, urban and rural—are at risk of having their economic development strategy sidelined by out-of-state activists focused more on advancing a narrow political agenda than on creating jobs here in Arizona.”

During testimony in committee, Montenegro and Coolidge pointed to polling conducted by the firm Cygnal in December 2025 that found that 90% of Arizonans believe ballot initiatives should be driven by Arizona residents, not out-of-state organizations, while 84% support requiring paid circulators to wear visible badges that include their name and home state. Additionally, 80% of voters support requiring initiatives that mandate new government spending to identify a funding source, and 70% support greater parity between state and local initiative processes.  Companion legislation in the Senate, SB 1489, sponsored by state Sen. T.J. Shope (R-Coolidge) will be heard on Friday by the Judiciary and Elections Committee.

The post House committee advances initiative reform bills with bipartisan support appeared first on Â鶹´«Ă˝Ół»­.